Shuttleworth Law P.C.

Shuttleworth Law P.C.

Call 888-529-3486
For a Free Case Evaluation

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense
      • Assault & Domestic Violence
      • Burglary, Robbery & Theft
      • Computer Crimes
      • Criminal Appeals
      • Criminal Investigations
      • Drug Crimes
      • DUI Defense
      • Expungements
      • Gun Crimes Defense
      • Homicide, Manslaughter, & Murder
      • Sex Crimes
      • Violent Crimes Defense
      • White-collar Crimes
    • Personal Injury
      • Bicycle Accidents
      • Car Accidents
      • Construction Accident
      • Medical Malpractice
      • Motorcycle Accidents
      • Pedestrian Accidents
      • Premises Liability
      • Wrongful Death
    • Protection From Abuse (PFA)
      • PFA Defense
      • PFAs for Victims
    • Strike 3 Holdings Defense
  • About Us
    • Brad V. Shuttleworth
    • Recent Case Results
    • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Shuttleworth Law P.C. Client Portal
    • FAQs
  • Contact Us Now

Criminal Lawyer Update: Mere Encounters of the Close Kind

Published on Jun 18, 2008

In a brand new opinion authored by Judge Stevens, the Pennsylvania Superior Court holds that the interaction between citizens and a police officer is a mere encounter, where the citizens are parked on the side of a road and the officer parks a patrol vehicle about 20 feet away and shines the headlights into the vehicle and approaches the vehicle with a flashlight to “stop and see if they’re all right”, in Commonwealth v. Collins, 2008 Pa. Super. 124 (Pa. Super. 2008). In this fact-intensive opinion, the court finds that this type of interaction with the police is a mere encounter, which does not rise to the level of an investigative detention, and therefore there was no seizure of the person to invoke any constitutional concerns.

Unsurprisingly, the court finds that “a reasonable person in Appelle’s position would be free to terminate the encounter” where the lights were shining on the vehicle in which the defendant was sitting, and the officer approached the car with a flashlight. Brilliantly, as the officer approached the car, the defendant rolled down the window, and in response to the officer’s inquiry of whether everything was OK, he blurted out that they had been smoking marijuana. The officer then had reasonable suspicion to detain them for a brief investigation.

Judge Donohue filed a dissenting opinion, agreeing with the trial court that a reasonable person in the defendant’s position would not have felt free to terminate the encounter with the police officer, and simply ignore the trooper, back out of the parking space and leave.

Had the court found that this encounter was an investigative detention, the evidence would have been suppressed because the officer testified that there was no suspicious activity when he approached the vehicle. Therefore, the investigative detention would not have been supported by reasonable suspicion, which is necessary under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. The officer filed a criminal complaint in this case charging the defendant with one count of possession of drug paraphernalia, which was what they found in the car.
I wouldn’t have felt free to leave in this situation. How about you?

To view this opinion, click here.

Were You Charged with a Crime in Pennsylvania or New Jersey?

If so, I can help, and I’m not afraid of taking on tough cases, either. Put an innovative and experienced criminal defense lawyer on your side by contacting me at Shuttleworth Law P.C. for a Free Case Evaluation. Call 888-529-3486 or message me here directly to request yours today.

Criminal Defense, Search & Seizure

Categories

  • Civil Rights (3)
  • Criminal Defense (179)
    • Appeals (1)
    • Arrests (4)
    • Assault (2)
    • Burglary (2)
    • Child Abuse (1)
    • Computer Crimes (7)
    • Conspiracy (2)
    • Contempt (3)
    • Corruption (2)
    • Criminal Law Courts (21)
    • Domestic Violence (4)
    • Drug Charges (4)
    • DUI (5)
    • Evidence (4)
    • Expungements & Pardons (3)
    • Felonies (7)
    • Forgery (3)
    • Gun Charges (18)
    • Homicide (7)
    • Insurance Fraud (2)
    • Manslaughter (4)
    • Misdemeanors (2)
    • Murder (1)
    • Pleas (1)
    • Police Conduct (9)
    • Prisons & Jails (11)
    • Probation and Parole (4)
    • Property Crime (1)
    • Rape (1)
    • Robbery (4)
    • Search & Seizure (31)
    • Sentencing (18)
    • Sex Crimes (6)
    • Traffic Stops (5)
    • Violent Crime (4)
    • Warrants (4)
    • Weapons (5)
    • White-Collar Crimes (2)
    • Wire Fraud (1)
  • Federal Indictments (1)
  • General Legal News (17)
  • Law Firm News (8)
  • Legislation (6)
  • Personal Injury (4)
    • Car Accidents (1)
    • Fault (1)
    • Pedestrian Accidents (1)
    • Statute of Limitations (1)
  • Protection From Abuse (PFA) (7)
    • PFA Defense (5)
  • Restraining Order (1)
  • Strike 3 Holdings (8)
  • Uncategorized (2)

Placeholder. Do not Delete.

Shuttleworth Law, P.C.
New Jersey Office:
1040 Mantua Pike
Wenonah NJ 08090
856-681-0185

Pennsylvania Office:
By appointment only

Call 888-529-3486
Available 24/7 for emergencies

Business Hours
Monday – Friday
8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

Facebook
Instagram
LinkedIn
TikTok
X (Formerly Twitter)

This website is for informational purposes only. Information presented isn’t legal advice and doesn’t form attorney-client relationships. Past results aren’t indicative of future results as all cases are unique. Laws affect each situation differently.

Copyright © 2005-2025 Brad V. Shuttleworth, Esq., Shuttleworth Law P.C. | Privacy Policy