Shuttleworth Law P.C.

Shuttleworth Law P.C.

Call 888-529-3486
For a Free Case Evaluation

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense
      • Assault & Domestic Violence
      • Burglary, Robbery & Theft
      • Computer Crimes
      • Criminal Appeals
      • Criminal Investigations
      • Drug Crimes
      • DUI Defense
      • Expungements
      • Gun Crimes Defense
      • Homicide, Manslaughter, & Murder
      • Sex Crimes
      • Violent Crimes Defense
      • White-collar Crimes
    • Personal Injury
      • Bicycle Accidents
      • Car Accidents
      • Construction Accident
      • Medical Malpractice
      • Motorcycle Accidents
      • Pedestrian Accidents
      • Premises Liability
      • Wrongful Death
    • Protection From Abuse (PFA)
      • PFA Defense
      • PFAs for Victims
    • Strike 3 Holdings Defense
  • About Us
    • Brad V. Shuttleworth
    • Recent Case Results
    • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Shuttleworth Law P.C. Client Portal
    • FAQs
  • Contact Us Now
Recent Case Results

Recent Case Results

Welcome to the Shuttleworth Law case results page, where our commitment to justice and relentless advocacy for our clients shines through. As a distinguished criminal defense and personal injury law firm serving the Greater Philadelphia area, we take pride in our track record of achieving favorable outcomes for those we represent. With unwavering dedication, legal expertise, and a deep understanding of our clients’ unique needs, we have successfully navigated a wide range of cases, from complex criminal matters to life-altering personal injury claims. Explore our recent victories below to gain insight into how the team at Shuttleworth Law P.C. can champion your legal rights and bring you the justice you deserve.

A.S. v. E.C.

Ruling: Case Dismissed

Protection from abuse action filed against client for alleged threats to a minor. After a court hearing, the matter was dismissed.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. A.J.

Ruling: Not Guilty

Client found not guilty of threatening to unload firearm into place of employment and possessing an instrument of crime. Philadelphia, PA.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. A.G.

Ruling: Withdrawn by Prosecution

Driving Under the Influence (DUI) case, where client was illegally pulled over by a Philadelphia Housing Authority (PHA) police officer. Motion to suppress filed based on illegal stop, a stop outside the PHA officer’s jurisdiction, and a motion to exclude results of chemical testing for being conducted more than two hours after client was operating the motor vehicle. All motions to suppress GRANTED, based on the police officer being found by a judge not to be credible. Prosecution withdrawn.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. C.L.

Ruling: Not Guilty

Client charged with armed robbery of a bank in Philadelphia. The entire incident was caught on video surveillance. Trial was held in front of a judge, and client was found not guilty of all charges. The defense was mistaken identification.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. D.A.

Ruling: Not Guilty

Client was charged with aggravated assault of a correctional officer while in custody at the Detention Center in Philadelphia, PA (which is part of the Philadelphia Prison System). He testified that he had to punch the correctional officer in self-defense, because he was attacked by two correctional officers. Client was found not guilty.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. D.C.

Ruling: Not Guilty

Client was accused of burglarizing a home at night. A neighbor, who testified as a witness, claimed to have seen the burglar, and recognized him as client. The witness also claimed he knew client from the neighborhood, which is why he recognized him. Mistaken identification was the defense. Client found not guilty of all charges.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. D.I.R.

Ruling: Case Dismissed

Client was charged with possession with intent to deliver and manufacture four marijuana plants. After there was a fire in the home, firefighters and police found the marijuana plants and growing equipment in the home, along with proof of residency for client. After a Municipal Court judge improperly found client guilty, an appeal was lodged in the Court of Common Pleas. After a contentious hearing, all charges were dismissed.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. D.K.

Ruling: Withdrawn by Prosecution

Driving Under the Influence (DUI) case, where client was pulled over by a police officer in an area known for a high incidence of drug dealing. A motion to suppress evidence was lodged, and the police officer’s credibility was challenged, because the police officer’s reports and testimony did not match the laboratory reports and other indisputable evidence. The police officer was found by a judge not to be credible, and the motion to suppress evidence was granted. Prosecution withdrawn.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. H.Q.

Ruling: Conviction Overturned

Client’s conviction overturned. Also then convinced prosecutor to withdraw case where previous attorney ineffective in representation. Philadelphia County, PA.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. J.B.

Ruling: Not Guilty

Client was charged with aggravated assault, simple assault, recklessly endangering another person, etc. Client was found not guilty of all charges at a bench trial for this alleged road-rage assault by hitting woman with his car.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. J.C.

Ruling: Not Guilty

Client found not guilty of road rage assault. Delaware County, PA.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. J.G.

Ruling: Case Dismissed

Charges for possession of a controlled substance dismissed. Client was accused of selling drugs in front of a narcotics police officer. Philadelphia County, PA.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. J.R.

Ruling: Not Guilty

Client found not guilty of gunpoint robbery in case of mistaken identification. Philadelphia, PA.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. M.R.

Ruling: Not Guilty

Client found not guilty of all charges, which included robbery, assault and possessing an instrument of crime. Police alleged that client robbed people in a bar with a crossbow. Philadelphia County, PA.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. S.D.

Ruling: Case Dismissed

Client was accused of aggravated assault and related charges for beating another person over the head with a lamp. Charges dismissed. Philadelphia, PA.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. S.J.

Ruling: Case Dropped

Client was found in possession of a firearm and controlled substances. Motion to Suppress Evidence lodged, alleging police officers illegally stopped client. Motion to Suppress Evidence GRANTED. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania forced to nolle pros (drop/withdraw) charges.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. S.L.

Ruling: Case Dismissed

Client accused, along with co-defendants, of pointing a firearm at complainants. Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus/Motion to Quash lodged. Charges dismissed.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. S.W.

Ruling: Charges Withdrawn

Client was charged with aggravated assault. The incident was outside a gas station, with video of the perpetrator. Police detectives secured a video of the incident. After working with a video expert, the detective and Assistant District Attorney for months regarding the fact that the person in the video was not client (despite the witness claiming he was positive the perpetrator was client and that he sees him in his neighborhoods), charges were withdrawn.


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. S.W.

Ruling: Not Guilty

Client was charged with Driving Under the Influence (DUI) and False Identification to Law Enforcement. A police officer testified that Client was driving a car, while he was under the influence, and that Client provided to him someone else’s Pennsylvania Driver’s license. A trial was in front of a jury, and the police officer’s credibility was challenged, because someone else was driving the car, and not client. At trial, the evidence showed that the police officer lied about client driving the car, and only did so because of an argument Client had with him. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty on all charges.


K.W. v. H.Q.

Ruling: Petition Withdrawn

Motion to dismiss Protection from Abuse Petition (PFA) lodged for lack of jurisdiction of Pennsylvania Courts. Plaintiff/Petitioner was forced to withdraw her petition. Philadelphia County, PA.


State of New Jersey v. G.G.

Ruling: Case Withdrawn

Client accused of possessing over 20 KILOGRAMS of synthetic marijuana for distribution in a joint DEA and State investigation. Charges withdrawn after litigating motion to suppress evidence for violations of constitutional rights. Mercer County, NJ.


R.R. v. City of Philadelphia

Ruling: Case Overturned

City’s decision to deny client a permit to carry a concealed firearm overturned. Philadelphia, PA.

Shuttleworth Law P.C. is a team of award-winning Philadelphia criminal defense and personal injury lawyers recognized for our results, client relationships, and courtroom experience. If you want advice about approaching your case, call our office for your Free Consultation at 888-529-3486.

Placeholder. Do not Delete.

google
Damon Galdo 2 days ago
Very professional. Brad was very kind and went out of his way to help out with matters not specific to my case. 5 stars across the board!
...
google
nicholas 2 days ago
It was awesome working with Brad, he was very trustworthy, communication was excellent and very easy person to work with. I would 1000% recommend to anyone. Thanks Brad and his team for their help.
...
google
Matt Phelps 2 weeks ago
Brad was always available to answer questions and always ensured they were answered in their entirety. I had spoken to other attorneys who just wanted to throw a large $$$ retainer without explaining exactly what they could deliver. Brad looked over the issue I brought to him, assessed the situation, and clearly explained what he could deliver. Brad ensured every aspect of the case was reviewed to ensure the best outcome was achieved. When meeting with Brad, he ensured his focus was on you and made you feel like his only client was you. Hands down, I highly recommend Brad!
...
google
Dave 2 weeks ago
Brad and his firm helped me quickly, fast response! Making it a smooth process. Took the time with me to go over details, even on a Sunday. I could tell he was on the phone at home, hearing his family in the background. left me with a good feeling i made right choice! can't recommend enough!
...
google
Melissa Rivera 2 weeks ago
Brad is very professional and honest, his staff is incredibly knowledgeable and helpful as well. From the moment we spoke I knew he was the lawyer to handle our case.
...
google
Melissa Montes 3 weeks ago
Brad was my fiancé’s attorney, he was truly exceptional from start to finish. He was incredibly attentive, knowledgeable, and well-mannered throughout the entire process. He consistently kept us informed, was reliable every step of the way, and ultimately got our case dismissed. His professionalism and dedication made a stressful situation so much easier. I highly recommend him to anyone in need of a defense attorney—his service is outstanding and absolutely deserves five stars. Thank you Brad!! Vinny and Melissa
...
google
Nicholas Caputo 1 month ago
I spoke with several attorneys before I decided on Brad. It was clear to me based on these discussions, that Brad was the one to go with - he is extremely knowledgeable and skilled in the field of copyright law. The information he provided was more consistent with my own research than others, he was able to share new information with me that I was able to independently confirm as accurate, and his proposed action plan and projected goal for settlement was far better than the competition. Brad answered literally all of my questions to my satisfaction and made himself available and accessible for regular contact via multiple methods. Brad is also very familiar with the attorneys in this space on the opposing side and has much experience in dealing with them. In the end, the whole process took about 6-7 weeks, and we settled for an amount that was even better than our initial projected goal. I am very pleased and impressed with the outcome and Brad's overall performance. I would certainly engage him again in the future and would recommend him to anyone attempting to effectively and efficiently resolve a copyright case. Five Stars.
...
google
Wookyung Kim 1 month ago
The explanation on the case was succinct, precise and easy to understand. The firm's performance and the results also were all satisfactory.
...
google
Tyler Berkheiser 1 month ago
Great experience, very responsive and professional. Handled my case quickly and kept me informed with every step. I will use Brad again if I ever have a need in the future.
...

Shuttleworth Law, P.C.
New Jersey Office:
1040 Mantua Pike
Wenonah NJ 08090
856-681-0185

Pennsylvania Office:
By appointment only

Call 888-529-3486
Available 24/7 for emergencies

Business Hours
Monday – Friday
8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

Facebook
Instagram
LinkedIn
TikTok
X (Formerly Twitter)

This website is for informational purposes only. Information presented isn’t legal advice and doesn’t form attorney-client relationships. Past results aren’t indicative of future results as all cases are unique. Laws affect each situation differently.

Copyright © 2005-2025 Brad V. Shuttleworth, Esq., Shuttleworth Law P.C. | Privacy Policy